Skip to main content

Full text of "On Gout as a Peripheral Neurosis"

See other formats


Google 



This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project 

to make the world's books discoverable online. 

It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject 

to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books 

are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. 

Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the 

publisher to a library and finally to you. 

Usage guidelines 

Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the 
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to 
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. 
We also ask that you: 

+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for 
personal, non-commercial purposes. 

+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine 
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the 
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. 

+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find 
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. 

+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just 
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other 
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of 
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner 
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe. 

About Google Book Search 

Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers 
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web 

at |http: //books .google .com/I 



lk;£l&ff!t@ 









ON GOUT 



ON GOUT 



AS A PERIPHERAL NEUROSIS 



J J J 



J - J 



^ O J ^ J 

J J 3 -' 

^ J V -< J J -* 






BY 



WILLOUGHBY FRANCIS WADE 

Fellow of the Royal Colleor of Physicians of London, &c., 
Consulting Physician to thr.Grnkkal Hospital, 

Birmingham. 




SiMPKiN, Marshall, Hamilton, Kbnt and Co., Limitbd. 

BIRMINGHAM : 
Cornish Brothers, New Street. 

1893. 



J 



J 






CHAPTER L 



TT is desirable to state the scope and object 
-^ of this essay. To do this clearly and 
briefly it is necessary to glance at the theories 
which have been or are current in regard to 
gout, of these there are broadly three. Firstly 
that which refers it to impurity of the blood, or, 
to maintain an old word which corresponds so 
little to modern conceptions as to have become 
almost obsolete, the humoral theory. Secondly 
the neural or nerve theory, which views gout 
as depending upon a disordered condition of the 
nervous system. Thirdly the neuro humeral 
theory, which combines the two first and regards 
gout as being due partly to disorder of the 
blood and partly to. disorder of the nervous 
system. 

Much as we know about gout, it would be 
idle to deny that there are still wide gaps or 

B 

J 



2 CHAPTER I. 

lacuna in our knowledge, many questions which 
we cannot at present answer. It is impossible 
to foresee what answer science will give, when 
she is able to give any, to these questions. It 
is therefore impossible to foresee in what way or 
to what extent these answers, when they come, 
will necessitate a new theory, or a modification 
of any one that we at present form. 

From the standpoint of our present knowledge 
it seems to me impossible to be satisfied with 
any theory less comprehensive than the neuro- 
humeral one. 

It may here be justly remarked that " the 
J system " is too vague a term, for this 
consists of collections of grey matter in 
,in, in the medulla, in the cord and in 
>\ia ganglia ; of white matter which is in 
ate apposition with the various grey foci, 
white matter which extends to the more 
parts of the body as nerve trunks, and 
ninute endings of these in the tissues. 
y," an objector may say " you ought if 
: me to accept your nerve-theory to tell 



CHAPTER I. 3 

me in which one of these various parts you 
locate the disease and for what reasons you fix 
on that particular part." The nearest approach 
to an answer which has heen given "to this 
fair objection is that it is " some nerve centre." 
Now I am not prepared to deny that this may 
be so. On the contrary, it would seem to me 
to be flying in the face of some of the most 
certainly ascertained clinical facts to deny that 
the highest centres may be concerned in the 
production of gout in particular instances. 
Because few facts in connection with gout are 
more certain than that excessive brain work, 
and care and anxiety are in some instances the 
apparent producers of the gouty attack, though 
whether by augmenting the gouty poison in the 
blood or by some direct action on the part which 
is attacked is by no means so certain. There are 
truly no lower centre or centres of which^ with 
certainty, as much can be said. But it would be 
fatuous to contend that evidence exists to show 
that the higher centres are in all cases the seat 
of origin of gout whether directly or indirectly. 



4 CHAPTER I. 

At all events I certainly do not do so. So that 
we are confronted with two facts. One that 
there are a multiplicity of phenomena which 
indicate that the nervous system is implicated 
in gout. The other, that we seek in vain for 
any precise indication that any one portion of 
the central nervous system can be identified as 
being, whether directly or indirectly, that which 
is so implicated, except in an occasional way. 
It was the pressure of this dilemma that 
caused me to turn my attention in another 
direction. 

A frequently occurring, and a most obvious 
feature of gout is its invasion of the joints, 
and the great numerical preponderance of 
instances in which the great toe is attacked as 
compared with any other joint. Any theory of 
gout which does not explain this superior 
frequency must be stamped with inadequacy. 
On the other hand any one which does, at once 
establishes a claim to attentive consideration. 

An investigation of the anatomy of the joint 
only served to corroborate Ebstein's dictum^ 



CHAPTER I. 



that there is no difference between it and any 
other joint in the body. That is to say no 
minute nor any coarse structural differenc« 
which throws light upon its pathological reaction 
to the poison of gout. But on the other hand 
I was struck by certain features of its environ- 
ment, which we have all known since we were 
students, but to which we have never given 
heed. Looked at from the point of view in 
which I then stood they assumed a possible 
importance. They recalled to my mind an 
isolated clinical observation of previous years 
and they determined me to institute a more 
searching and minute examination of living 
cases of the disease. It Is the result of such 
investigations and the inferences to be drawn 
from them that are related in sub;sec 



CHAPTER 11. 



"%VTE are familiax with the swelling, redness 
* ^ and extreme sensitiveness of the skin 
over the toe-joint in acute gout. We know 
also that a similar condition is observed often 
to exist in the neighbouring skin and soft parts. 
As this condition subsides a time comes when 
the patient will, though reluctantly, allow the 
part to be cautiously handled. It is a good 
many years since it became known to me, that 
the tenderness did not like the redness and 
swelKng abate equably over all the surface. In 
some places the skin remained tender in others 
not. The tenderness had a '* patchy" character. 
There v>/as not always a corresponding difference 
of appearance in the skin. This long remained 
to me an isolated clinical fact, unexplained 
though of pretty constant occurrence. 



CHAPTER II. 7 

Subsequently, as I have said, my attention 
was again attracted to this subject and I 
investigated it more closely, I then found that 
the residual tenderness might not only be in 
the shape of spots and patches, but also in that 
ot lines. I will cite as examples of this latter 
condition two cases which have been under my 
care this year. 

One was a lady, aged about sixty, for twelve 
years subject to attacks of acute gout in the 
great toes and other parts. Her heart, lungs 
and stomach were failing and she died a few 
days after my only visit. I found that wi''^'- 
a few days she had had gout in the left 
which had entirely recovered. Before it 
well gout had come on in the right toe, w 
was still swollen and painful. From the 
of the toe for about one and a half inches t 
extended a narrow line of acute tenden 
There was no super-jacent redness or swel 
Pressure on each side of this line was absoh 
painless. The line itself was apparently e 
in breadth to the diameter of an ordinary i 
steel knitting pin. 



8 CHAPTER 11. 

The second case occurred before the one 
above described.— 

A gentleman, aged fifty-eight, had a first 
attack of acute gout in the left gi'eat toe, 
extending also a little above it. After a few 
days' treatment this abated, and the great toe- 
joint admitted of passive movement in all 
directions, the opposing surfaces of the two 
bones being at the same time firmly pressed 
against each other. But a line of tenderness, 
similar to that described in the former case, 
remained. It started from the base of the great 
toe and extended slantingly across the foot as 
far as the centre of the bend of the ankle. The 
tenderness disappeared at the rate of about 
three-quarters of an inch a day from above 
downwards. There was during this period no 
diminution of the tenderness in the part which 
remained tender. For the sake of clearness I 
have described this case as it appeared after all 
redness and swelling had disappeared. For the 
sake of accuracy I must now state that the line 
of tenderness existed while the redness and 



CHAPTER TI. 9 

swelling still remained over its distal part. The 
upper portion lay in a part which had not been 
red, swelled, or painful. 

We have now to determine the anatomical 
seat of this tenderness. If we refer to Swan's 
*^ Demonstration of the nerves of the human 
body," we find (plate xxiv, fig. 2,) a nerve 
which he describes thus " No. 4 Inner division 
of the dorsal branch of the peroneal nerve, 
giving filaments to the foot, the inner side of 
the great toe, the outer side of the second and 
the inner side of the third toes." But if we 
look again at Swan's plate we find that the 
nerve No. 4 divides just at the middle of the 
lower border of the anterior annular ligament 
into two branches. Of these one runs 
slantingly across the foot to the base of the 
great toe and it is this branch which is 
distributed to the great toe. The other branch 
is distributed to the other toes. 

According to this authority then, this nerve 
follows a course which coincided with the line 
of tenderness, the breadth of which, so far as we 



10 CHAPTER II. 

can judge, corresponded with that of the nerve. 
The tendon of the long extensor of the great 
toe runs a somewhat similar course but its 
width is several times that of the nerve. So 
much so that I cannot think that, if it were 
tender, the tenderness could with any accuracy 
be spoken of as a " narrow line." Voluntary 
movements of the great toe in the second case 
were quite painless, which is probably incon- 
sistent with an acutely tender state of the 
extensor tendon. 

The veins over an acutely gouty joint no 
doubt often appear to be tender. Whether this 
tenderness is intrinsic or merelv results from 
the distension affording greater resistance 
behind the skin when this is struck, and so 
enhancing the skin tenderness it is not needful 
here to enquire. For there was no venous 
distension present in either case at the time 
spoken of 

I submit then that there is good ground for 
the conclusion that the nerve was the anatomical 
seat of this tenderness. 



CHAPTER II. 11 

Two farther questions of great importance 
now arise. Firstly what is the nature of this 
neuropathy? Secondly what is its relation to 
the gouty joint ? The consideration of theee 
questions will be conveniently postponed till 
after attention has been called to some other 
clinical facts. 

Gout as affecting the hands, may as regards 
its acute, subacute, or chronic phases, be 
divided into five classes. First — Gout in the 
knuckles : Second — In the back of the hands : 
Third — In the ball of the thumb : Fourth — In 
the hypothenar region : Fifth — Those causes in 
which two or more of the previous classes occur 
at the same time. 

My first observations in this clinical division 
were made upon myself, for I have twice had 
gout in the root of each thumb, and once in the 
right hypothenar region. But only two of these 
attacks have occurred since my attention has 
been directed to these investigations, and I was 
at the same time sufficiently well to investigate 
my symptoms. In the hypothenar attack tha 



12 CHAPTER II. 

pain and tenderness in the part itself were, 
though quite distinct, by no means severe. 
But on examination I found that there was 
extreme tenderness on pressing the wrist, just 
to the radial side of the pisiform bone. The 
pressure left an aching at the part where it was 
applied, and produced for some hours an increase 
of the pain and tenderness in the hypothenar 
region. Pressure here, in healthy persons, 
produces a contraction of the abductor muscle 
of the little finger. This is not absent when in 
gouty persons there is also tenderness on 
pressure. From this, as well as from anatomical 
considerations, it is to be inferred that it is the 
ulnar nerve which is the seat of this tenderness. 
Here is another instance : Meeting in the street 
a gentleman, set. fifty-two, who has for some 
years suffered a good deal from acute joint gout, 
he told me that during the preceding night gout 
** had come out" in his hand, indicating the 
hypothenar region. I said give me your hand. 
As I was slipping my thumb under his cufi* he 
said " Oh no its not there, there is nothing 



OnAPTER II. 13 

there." By this time I had my thumb in 
positioQ and gave a squeeze. He snatched his 
hand away, exclaiming in a voice too loud for 
the street '* Oh, by gad there is though ! " and 
added " I never felt anything there till you 
pressed it." I have mentioned this case in 
somewhat trivial detail to show that there was 
no collusion or self-deception. 

A medical man set. seventy-two had for several 
weeks remittent and chiefly nocturnal pain and 
swelling in the knuckles, and paiufulness on 
usage, of the right hand. He was much 
surprised on finding that pressure at the point 
indicated was extremely painful and that the 
pain remained there for some hours^ after. He 
was also an example of the next form of 
tenderness, namely, that in connection with the 
thumb. My first observation of this form was 
made on myself There was a good deal of 
pain all round the ball and root of the thumb, 
with redness and some swelling, movement was 
painful. Keeping the bones straight and 
holding the first phalanx no pain was produced 



7 



14 CHAPTER II. 

by pressing firmly and moving the joints, so far 
as that could be done withuot disturbing the 
soft parts- Pressure on the wrist in the interval 
between the tendons of the two extensors of 
the thumb was acutely painful, it also much 
aggravated the painfulness of the thumb for 
some hours after. It is to be noted with regard 
to the case of the medical man at seventy-two 
that just at the wrist-joint the ulnar nerve gives 
off a deep branch which supplies inter alia the 
joint between the metacarpal bone and the first 
phalanx of the ring finger, of the second finger 
and of the fore-finger (Swan, pi. xxii, fig, 2, 
Nos. 28, &c.) I have also found tenderness in 
the nerves which run one on each side near to 
the dorsum of the fingers and one on each side 
of their palmar aspects. If there should, as 
there may, be general tenderness of the fingers, 
the sites of these nerves cannot be distinoruished. 
So far as I have been able to test it, and that 
has been in about a dozen consecutive cases, 
tenderness will almost certainly be tound in one 
or more of the situations indicated when there 



CHAPTER II. 1 5 

is or recently has been gout in or flying about 
the hand or fingers. There is also another 
place where tenderness may be found. This is 
about the centre of Ihe dorsum of the wrist, 
just where Swan shows a branch of the ulnar 
nerve, joining one from the radial. 

Let us now turn to another division of the 
subject. Persons who are in a gouty condition 
are subject to pain and tenderness, recurring at 
irregular intervals and of very variable, some- 
times persistent, sometimes of only momentary 
duration, about the ball of the great toe. This 
tenderness is specially felt in walking. This 
pain is, by common consent and repute, located 
in the metatarso -phalangeal joint of that toe. 

This view receives primd facie support from 
physical examination. For undoubtedly pressure 
applied over the upper aspect of the joint, or at 
its side, or on the lower aspect of the joint may 
elicit a complaint of tenderness in one or more of 
these situations. I myself have for years been 
from time to time subject to this affection. And 
for years in dutiful submission to current 



16 CHAPTER II. 

teaching looked upon the joints as the seat of 
the trouble. The circumstances previously 
stated led me to investigate the matter impar- 
tially and de novo. What did I find ? In the 
first place that passive movement of the joint 
surfaces upon themselves, the first phalanx held 
firmly between finger and thumb and all 
possible pressure made upon the joint was 
absolutely painless. There was no evidence of 
fluid in the joint. It is impossible without 
cutting into it to obtain stronger evidence that 
the joint was healthy. 

On critical examination the tenderness was 
and will be found as above mentioned in one or 
more of three situations. If we look at Swan's 
demonstrations (pi. xxiv., fig. 2), we find that 
two branches of the internal plantar nerve lie 
one to the outer side and one to the inner side 
of the plantar aspect of the great toe. I have 
demonstrated to myself on myself many scores 
of times that what appears on ofF-hand examin- 
ation to be tenderness in the great toe-joint is 
really one or two lines of tenderness occupying 



CHAPTER II. 17 

the site of these two nerves. When there is 
only one Hne it is commonly, but not invariably, 
the inner one Between these two lines is to 
be felt the bone absolutely indolent. No doubt 
if we press over the joint we shall find tender- 
ness, because the nerves run across the joint. 
But we shall also commonly find an equal degree 
of tenderness in both the distal and the 
proximal sections of these nerves quite away 
from the joint. With regard to the tenderness 
over the superior aspect of the joint enough has 
been said in speaking of it in acute gout. Only 
adding that it occurs in the absence of that 
disorder. The side tenderness I have found not 
only under the circumstance with which we are 
now dealing but also on the abatement of acute 
gout. It is I think probably situated in branches 
of the peroneal (so called by Swan and by 
Quain and Ellis external-popliteal) nerve. Or it 
may be in the saphenous nerve. Probably the 
former, as it has not appeared to me to have 
sufficient longitudinal extension to be situated 
in the latter. 



18 CHAPTER II. 

There is another part in which I have found 
tenderness. In most accounts of gout we find 
mention of pain and tenderness in the sole of the 
foot as occurring in certain cases. This tender- 
ness is always described as being situated in the 
plantar fascia. Nor would I deny that such 
may be the case. But on the other hand I 
have found a line of tenderness near the iuner 
margin of the sole of the foot. On referring to 
Swan (pi. XXV., fig. 3, No. 8), we find that just 
in this situation lies a slender nerve which he 
thus describes. " A branch of the branch five 
of the inner plantar nerve, to terminate in the 
joint of the great toe between the metatarsal 
bone and the first phalanx." " Branch five " is 
the nerve which has been referred to as running 
on the inner side of the inferior aspect of the 
great toe. It may be argued that if the in- 
flammation of the great toe-joint depended upon 
a morbid condition of this nerve, it should in all 
cases be found to be tender. I shall deal with 
this argument hereafter. 

I have repeatedly verified in other persons 
the fact that tenderness supposed to be in the 



CHAPTER II. 19 

toe-joint was really located in one of these 
nerves and not in the joint. 

Pains and tenderness in the thick of the 
heel — I am not now alluding to the tendo 
Achillis — are common in gouty persons. Few 
old gouty patients are not familiar with their 
occurrence from time to time, though they often 
do not think enough of it to mention it to the 
doctor. The outer half of the heel receives its 
nervous supply from a nerve compounded of a 
" communicating tibial branch of the sciatic 
nerve " and a " cutaneous branch of the peroneal 
nerve, receiving the communicating tibial" 
(Swan, pi. XXV., fig. 2, Nos. 20 and 21). This 
joint nerve in its course lies behind the outer 
ankle. 

The inner half of the heel is supplied by the 
posterior tibial which lies behind the inner aokle. 

Now I have often noticed in myself the 
following facts, which however I have not yet 
had an opportunity of verifying in other cases. 
The pain commonly of an aching, sometimes of 
a burning, character, a superficial and also a 



20 CHAPTER II. 

deep-seated tenderness, may occupy either one 
lateral half of the heel or both halves at the 
same time. In the latter case they may not be 
of the same intensity on each side. Distinct 
tenderness may be correspondingfly present 
behind one or both ankles, presumably in the 
nerve - trunks above mentioned. But such 
tenderness is not invariably present. 

Tenderness in all the above mentioned 
situations, both in the feet and in the hands 
and wrists may from time to time be found even 
when the patient has not felt it during their 
ordinary use. Its presence is of importance as, 
in my opinion, identifying as gouty, visceral or 
other symptons which we should otherwise only 
with uncertainty suspect to be so. 

These pains are notoriously fugitive, often a 
mere momentary dart. The tenderness also is 
often inconstant, present and absent in the 
course perhaps of half an hour; or if not 
absolutely vanishing yet varying much in 
intensity. This I have repeatedly observed in 
myself. 



CHAPTER II. 21 

I desire now to turn to another matter, 
namely the connection of articular gout with 
injury. This connection is well known, but I 
am not sure that it habitually receives as 
minute attention as it deserves. I shall briefly 
catalogue the various circumstances under which 
it presents itself. 

We may divide these cases into three classes. 
First — Gross mechanical injuries such as sprains, 
bruises or blows. Second — Minor mechanical 
injuries. Third — What may be described as 
physiological injuries. Of the first class we 
have several varieties. First — When a first 
attack of gout appears in a part long after the 
injury has occurred. A clergyman sprained his 
right ankle badly in running down stairs. It 
was not till fifteen years after that he, being 
hereditarily gouty, had an attack of gout 
(traceable to worry) and that was in this ankle. 
Second — cases in which gout immediately or very 
shortly follows the injury and is confined to the 
injured part. This happened to a gouty surgeon 
who not very severely sprained his right knee 



22 CHAPTER II. 

by being tbrown from his tricycle. In two or 

three days the knee, in which there had 

remained a little pain from the time of the 

accident became the seat of an acute and very 

long continued attack of gout. Third — Cases in 

which gout appears in other joints as well as in 

the injured one. A gentleman set. fifty who had 

had, during the previous twelve years, several 

severe attacks of gout, twisted his ankle, it 

remained very painful and soon became swollen, 

during the night the other ankle also became 

swollen and painful, and he then recognised 

that he had gout in both joints. This opinion 

was confirmed by the Italian doctor whom he 

called in, he being at the time at Turin. He 

* was confined to bed for sis weeks. Another 

gouty man of about the same age fell and 

twisted his knee, it very shortly after was seized 

gout This migrated to the other 

squently to each ankle, and finally 

I the knee first affected. He had a 

troublesome attack, lasting many 

lady set. eighty-four, who was of a 



CHAPTER II. 23 

gouty stock, but had never had gout, was 
thrown from a high dog-cart. She did not know 
exactly how she fell, but not on her back. In 
two or three days she had very acute gout in 
both wrists and subsequently in both elbows. 

Fourth — Cases in which there is a long 
interval between the accident and the gout, but 
not entire freedom from symptoms due to the 
accident. While getting into my carriage with 
the right foot on the step the horses gave a 
start. From that time with variations in 
degree, but rarely if ever complete absence, my 
knee was more or less but never severely painful 
on movement. The pain was in a transverse 
line just above the joint and there was also 
tenderness. These symptoms lasted for ten 
months. At the end of that time I went to 
Buxton and put myself under the care of my 
friend Dr. Robertson. The baths relieved 
without entirely curing the knee and quite 
relieved the general arterial tension which had 
been all the time unduly high. Within a week 
of my return home acute inflammation of the 



24 CHAPTER II. 

knee-joint, with great effiision, occurred. It is 
worth mentioning that at Buxton in a bath at 
98° the water appeared to the knee to be 
several degrees colder than it did to any other 
part of the body. When I have pain in 
the heels hot baths, whether whole or partial, 
generally feel hotter to the heel than to other 
parts. This form of altered sensibility, which I 
have known to occur in other persons points to 
an abnormal state of the sensory nerves. 

Fifth — I am not cognisant of any case in 
which injury to one joint has appeared to cause 
gout not in it but in another. 

The second class comprises those cases in 
which minor injuries appear to cause gout. It 
is hardly necessary to point out that the 
distinction between " gross " and " minor " 
injuries is of a somewhat arbitrary character. 
These cases present many varieties. 

First — Production of gout by the use of 
parts, as of the thumb from writing, or from 
repeated use of it for lifting purposes. Of both 
these I have had experience in my own person. 



CHAPTER II. 25 

Second — Aggravation of gout by use of the 
part. A widow lady was much addicted to 
crochet work. She used to have attacks of gout 
in the right hand, which unless or until they 
were so severe as to make it impossible she did 
not allow to interrupt her work. For two years 
her left arm and leg have been absolutely 
paralysed. During that time she has often 
been in a gouty condition and has several times 
had gout in the right hand, but never at all 
approaching in severity those she used to have 
previous to the paralytic attack. 

Three — Reproduction of gout by use of the 
part. A gentleman fond of and accustomed to 
pedestrian exercise has had many attacks of 
acute gout in various parts. On two occasions 
when the feet and ankles had been affected, 
he, when he thought himself sufficiently re- 
covered, walked several miles in heavy boots. 
On both occasions acute gout was reproduced in 
the parts which had been affected. 

Four — Production of gout by pressure. The 
familiar examples of this are found in cases 



26 CHAPTEB II. 

where gout in the great-toe is produced, 
aggravated or reproduced by the pressure of a 
too tight boot. Here is aa example of a 
diflferent kind, which occurred in my own 
person. At a certain stage of my knee attack 
all symptoms had -disappeared except the 
swelling, which was great and prevented the 
knee from being flexed. I had occasion (before 
I had left my bed) to drive for about an hour 
into the country, see a patient and drive back 
again. In my carriage, in order to avoid any 
discomfort to the joint, I stretched the sound 
leg straight out and placed the other limb upon 
it as upon a splint. The outside of the right 
heel rested upon the dorsum of the left foot 
towards its outer edge. I came back and went 
to bed, none the worse as regards the knee. 
But in the course of an hour I felt pain in the 
outer side of the right heel. On examination it 
was found to be tender and brightly red over a 
circular space larger than a half-crown. This 
condition took three days to disappear. This it 
may be said is a trivial instance of gouty 



CHAPTER II. 27 

inflammation. That is so. But any adequate 
theory of disease must be able to explain trivial 
just as much as the most portentous symptoms. 
It may be asked, why, action and reaction being 
equal and opposite, no efiect was produced 
on the dorsum of the left foot ? Without under- 
taking to answer that question in full it may be 
pointed out, First — That the tissues of the heel 
are dense and tense, while those of the other 
part are lax. Second — That gout is common in 
the heel, very rare in the other part. Third — 
That gout was already manifested in the right 
limb and not in the left. 

It is generally recognised that gout may be 
produced in joints by cold, and by wet feet. 
And if producible it may be aggravated or 
reproduced by the same agency. 

Five — If such disorders as bronchial gastric or 
intestinal catarrh may be gouty, as many 
physicians besides myself think, there can be no 
need to plead that cold may be an element in 
their production as it is in non-gouty cases. 

Six — Neuralgia and neuritis as distinct 
and substantive disorders which are not always 



28 CHAPTER 11. 

distinguishable the one from the other are by 
recognised authorities with whom I am in entire 
accord, attributed in certain instances to the 
gouty condition, or, to use another phrase, to 
the gouty poison. Cold is often a factor in 
their production. 

Seven — In coming to such disorders as gout 
in the stomach we are upon more debatable 
ground. Sir Thomas Watson said he had often 
found that " gout in the stomach " resolved itself 
under the influence of an emetic " into pork " in 
the stomach. To those who believe that gout 
may be produced in the toe by the pressure of 
a tight boot this dictum would go to prove, not 
that these attacks were not gout, but that they 
were gout, and gout produced by a sufficient 
and ascertainable cause, viz., a local irritant. 
That certainly is the eflfect produced upon my 
mind. 

Before leaving this part of my subject one or 
two remarks. Is it not the case that external 
agencies have not been sufficiently regarded as 
gout producers ? That these cases have been 



CHAPTER II. 29 

looked upon rather as exceptions and oddities, . 
without any special or deep significance ? If so, 
that, insufficient inquiry has been made into 
the minute history of gouty cases in respect to 
previous or coincident injuries or other external 
influences? Finally, if so, might not a more 
constant and minute inquiry reveal a much 
more constant relation between such external 
circumstances and the appearance of gout in a 
particular part ? 



30 



CHAPTER HI. 



"TTTE now have to enquire into the nature of 
" ^ the morbid condition of the local nerves 
which is so frequently to be found in the vicinity 
ot gouty manifestations, whether these be acute 
and severe or subacute and slight. 

Let us consider to what known pathological 
conditions this affection is most akiu, having 
regard to its clinical features. It is obvious 
these resemble those of neuralgia, hyperaemia 
of the nerves, and neuritis both acute and 
chronic. Neuralgia has no pathological anatomy, 
for the view which has been supported by some 
authorities, viz — that it is in all cases due to 
neuritis is not generally accepted. At the 
same time it has an undoubted clinical existence, 
and in some respects the features of this gouty 
neuropathy resemble those of neuralgia. But 



CHAPTER III. 31 

little is known about hypereemia of the nerves 
or its actual clinical occurrence. Erb remarks 
on hypersemia of the nerves, that " it appears to 
be deserving of some attention in the future, 
since, perhaps, many so called functional 
neuroses are referable to it." 

Of neuritis both acute and chronic much 
is known both clinically and pathologically. 
Both neuralgia and neuritis are recognised by 
the best authorities as occurring in gouty 
persons and as being actually due to gout. Nor 
are they as substantive diseases, that is as 
existing independently of joint-gout at all rare 
affections. An attempt therefore to give a new 
significance to neuritis and to extend its domain 
into parts where its existence has not hitherto 
been recognised, is in accordance with, and not 
hostile to, facts already known and accepted. 

It will not be useless to state now some of 
the facts of the natural history of acute neuritis. 
And these I shall take almost verbatim from 
the excellent article by Professor Erb in Von 
Ziemmsen's Cyclopoedia of the Practice of 
Medicine. 



32 CHAPTER III. 

Etiology. The most frequent and best known 
causes of neuritis are wounds of various kinds, 
contusion, rupture, &c. Slight mechanical 
injuries may also cause neuritis, such as a blow 
on a nerve trunk, strong compression of a nerve, 
severe concussions of the nerves from long 
travelling in an ill-constructed wagon, sudden 
and violent muscular movements, violent efforts 
to raise heavy weights, &c. It also arises from 
" catching cold," exposure to a draught of air, &c. 
Inflammations of various organs constitute a 
very common cause of neuritis. After acute 
diseases neuritic processes are not unfrequently 
developed. Lastly, no one can wonder that it 
is impossible in many cases to discover the real 
cause of neuritis, and hence that we must speak 
of its origin as spontaneous. It appears more- 
over, as if many persons have a special 
predisposition to neuritis, and especially as if 
the disposition for the disease to spread upwards 
or downwards along the nerves is present in 
very different degrees in different individuals. 
Special attention must be paid to this point in 



CHAPTER in. 33 

future." As regards the pathology of neuritis 
much does not require to be said. In the earlier 
stages there are microscopical evidences of in- 
flammation in the neurilemma, then incipient 
disintegration of the medulla and finally of the 
axis cylinder. It may be taken that it is not in 
all cases of neuritis that the inflammatory 
process reaches to this last stage, and restoration 
of the nerve may be established. We find that 
there are two classes of change in these cases. 
The one affecting the protective coverings of 
the nerve ; the other affecting its conducting 
apparatus. The two classes of change give rise 
to two classes of symptoms. The one resembling 
those common to inflammatory aflfections, the 
other due to interference with, or abolition of, 
the functions of the nerve as a conductor of 
force. These vary according to the special 
endowments of the nerve affected. When they 
are of a trophic or vasomotor character, the 
changes are also of that character, It remains 
to mention one other feature of neuritis. 
In whatever part in the course of a nerve it 




34 CHAPTER ni. 

originates, it has a tendency to spread both 
downwards towards the periphery (neuritis 
descendens), and upwards towards the centre 
(neuritis ascendens). But according to all 
authorities the ascending is much more common 
than the descending form of extension. It is 
also believed that without any upward extension 
of the actual inflammation an influence may 
ascend from the inflamed part upwards to the 
cord, disturbing its functions and even causing 
myelitis and its ordinary results. I will 
not go into details respecting the chronic 
form of neuritis, which may either be a primary 
affection, or secondary to an acute attack. But 
it may be well to draw the readers attention to 
certain of the clinical features of neuritis and 
neuralgia which find a distinct parallel in those 
of gout. 

Origin from injuries, and from cold. 

Intensity of the pain. 

Intensity of the tenderness over both the 
trunk of the nerve and its peripheral distribution. 

Pain and tenderness, the earliest symptoms. 



CHAPTER III. 35 

Radiation of pain towarfs periphery. 

Remissions of pain. 

Exacerbations tend to be nocturnal. 

Pain auo;mented by every movement of the 
part. 

Cramps of muscles. 

The (as a rule) more intense and early involve- 
ment of sensory, as compared with motor, nerves. 

Sensitiveness to pressure constant in neuritis. 
Not constant in neuralgia. 

Trophic disturbances of skin, nails and joints. 

Hence glossiness of the skin in cases of long 
standing. 

Vasomotor disturbances. 

It must not be forgotten that the conductivity 
of the nerves may be impaired in quite another 
way than by inflammation of the neurilemma. 

Certain poisons introduced into the blood are 
capable of producing a degeneration of the white 
substance of Schwann and of the axis cylinder. 
Of this the Diphtheria poison is an example. 
It would be more correct to say the Diphtheria 
poisons, for there are two, an ulbumose and an 



36 CHAPTER in. 

organic acid. Each of these, the albumose more 
actively than the organic acid, is capable of 
disintegrating motor, sensory, and sympathetic 
nerves. Their action is firstly on the white 
substance of Schwann and secondarily on the 
axis cylinder, the neurilemma where that exists' 
is but slightly if at all affected. Such at all 
events are the conclusions drawn by Dr. Sidney 
Martin, from his admirable investigations as 
detailed in his Goulatonian Lectures (1892). 

It seems to me probable that the painlessness 
of Diphtherial paralysis is due to the absence of 
changes in the neurilemma 

i necessary to enumerate the many 
)f gout which support the idea, 
by CuUen, and now generally enter- 
lat there is an intimate connection 
his disease and the nervous system, 
lot a treatise on gout but an effort to 
: view that, granting this connection, 
s peripheral nerves we must look for 
id chief bond of union. I venture to 
t what has been said will lead the 



CHAPTER III. 37 

reader to feel that after all it would not be very 
surprising if this view should turn out to be 
correct. 



38 



CHAPTER IV. 



nnO give reasons, acceptable as it is hoped 
-■- they may be, for thinking that there is 
no inherent improbability, but the reverse, in 
the neural element of gout being principally a 
disorder of local nerves is not sufficient, it is 
necessary to give reasons for thinking that it is. 
Let us examine the two first cases which 
I have described. One was a case of first 
attack, in the other there was a history of 
many previous attacks, of genuine gout occu- 
pying its ordinary seat, the tarso-metatarsal 
joint of the great toe. In each there was 
evidence which would under any other circum- 
stances be accepted as proof of the existence of 
neuritis in close proximity to, indeed at one 
extremity terminating at, the joint. Why 



CHAPTER IV. 39 

should this evidence not be accepted as equally- 
conclusive in these cases ? It is a fact, at all 
events it is accepted as one by all the best 
modern authorities that neuritis occurs as an 
isolated and distinct aflPection in gouty persons. 
It is believed by the same authorities that it is 
a manifestation of the gouty condition or poison. 
In short, that there is truly such a thing as 
gouty neuritis Is there then any inherent 
improbability that it may occur not only as an 
isolated affection but also in close connection 
with another local gouty inflammation, that 
namely of a joint ? Quite the contrary is the 
case. " Inflammations of neighbouring organs, 
extending to nerves traversing or adjoining such 
organs, constitute a very common cause of 
neuritis." (Erb). The fact then that neuritis 
is to be found not only as an isolated affection, 
but in close connection with the ordinary acute 
joint-affection of gout, is important. The 
bringing into close relation and proximity these 
two reputedly separate affections is a distinct 
step in an argument aiming to show that one is 




40 CHAPTER^IV. 

dependant upon the other. But it is quite in- 
conclusive as to which is the primary and which 
the secondary affection. Indeed if it points to 
any conclusion, it is to one which is quite in 
consonance with current opinion and accepted 
fact6, viz. : that the neuritis is a secondary 
inflammation set up hy a primary infiammation 
of the joint. 

But now let us turn to the consideration of 
the other category of cases. It will probably 
not be disputed that in the common opinion 
they do not differ from acute attacks in kind 
but only in degree. But what does an examin- 
ation more searching and minute than ordinary 
reveal 1 The presence of neuritis, the absence 
of arthritis. The presence of a nerve disorder, 
the absence of a joint disorder. The pnor 
presence of a nerve disorder of a kind which is 
admittedly capable of producing sensory, vaso- 
motor, and trophic changes in parts which as a 
nerve it supplies. The subsequent appearance 
of such sensory vaso-motor and trophic changes. 
There is here — it is right to point out — a link 



CHAPTER IV. 41 

at present missing. We may easily find 
instances in which an acute arthritis has been 
preceded by the minor pains and tenderness 
which are, not ia the joint as has hitherto been 
assumed, but in adjacent nerves. And I have 
seen cases (two recently), in which there was 
at the same time gouty affection of the thumb 
without arthritis and gouty affection of the 
fingers with arthritis and efiiision into some of 
the knuckle-joints. 

We want to trace a pre-existing neuritis 
actually culminating in a frank attack of 
arthritic gout. We can hardly expect to have 
an opportunity of seeing this in our ordinary 
patients. But there are many gouty medical 
men. Is it too much to hope that they will 
summon up courage enough to examine them- 
selves, or to permit some one else to examine 
them with minuteness in the first onset of 
acute gout. The point to be determined is this. 
Is there tenderness in the skin or in some of the 
nerve-trunks surrounding the toe-joint at a 
time when there is no tenderness in the toe- 



42 CHAPTBE IV. 

joint itself? The thumb or indeed any other 
joint may be put to the question in a similar 
manner. 

It must however be remembered that such an 

examination may be inconclusive. A neuritis 

need not extend far from the joint, for the 

effects of the suspension of nerve conduction 

are the same in whatever portion of the 

individual nerve fibre the obstacle occurs. Or 

indeed if as in the arthropathy of tubes c 

the nerve influence is affected at its 

source. And if the skin to which it 

is distributed be at the same time very tender 

30 impossible to determine whether 

is in the skin or in the joint. 

e is this the case when the minute 

a nerve itself is inflamed and lies 

joint, for a slight movement of the 

he, indeed often is, extremely painful 

-he joint be evidently not affected. 

her similar cases it may be impossible 

■ certain that the pain is confined to 

tarts and not also partly in the joint. 



CHAPTER IV. 43 

I hope indeed that all tlie clinical statements 
upon which my argument is based may be 
rigorously tested by those who have the 
opportunity. 

I venture now to claim to have established 
a high degree of probability that in gouty 
arthritis the joint affection is secondary to 
and caused by a preceding (though possibly only 
by a very short time) affection of the peripheral 
nerves From this point of view a neuro-humoral 
theory of Gout should be stated thus : — 

In certain individuals, many of whom have a 
parentage members of which have been similarly 
affected, aberration of proteid metabolism occurs. 
Its causes, origin and stages are unknown. The 
most manifest of its terminal products is uric 
acid. This in the form of quadriurate of soda 
is present in the blood in abnormal quantity 
and lowers its alkalinity. It is suspected, 
though not decisively determined, that there 
may be also present other terminal, collateral, or 
bye products. 

The circumstances under which this hypo — or 
para — metabolism happens are excessive mental 



44 CHAPTER IV. 

• 

strain especially if consisting of or accompanied 
by anxiety or worry, excessive use of certain 
kinds of food, or of alcohol, especially of 
fermented malt liquors, or of strong or highly 
saccharated or hyperacid, or effervescing wines 
or those with a high percentage of sstherial 
products. In consequence of this blood-state, 
the stability of the nerve-trunks is impaired ; 
and therefore their power of resisting external 
influences which would be inoperative upon 
normal nerves. These external influences are 
the ordinary and still more the extraordinary, 
use and effort of parts, concussion, and com- 
pression of the nerves themselves, injury or 
strain, irritants or cold. 

The combined result of the intrinsic state of 
the nerve trunks and of extrinsic influences is 
the production of further changes in the nerves 
notified by symptoms which are those either of 
neuralgia or of neuritis, or of both, but the 
anatomical basis of these has not as yet been 
investigated. 

The further effects of this neuropathy depend 
first, on its intensity, second, on the endowments 



CHAPTER IV. 45 

of the nerve affected, viz., sensory, vaso-motor, 
trophic, or motor, third, on the territorial 
distribution of its ultimate branches, fourth, on 
the involvement of two or more of the above 
four classes of nerveg. 

The blood poison seems to have an elective 
affinity for the various classes of nerves in the 
order in which they are above stated. 

An increase, especially if it be sudden, in the 
blood dyscrasia also enhances the neuropathy, 
and may possibly be able to induce it without 
the co-operation of any external cause. Such 
increase may be due to — 

First — Aggravation of the primary cause of 
the altered metabolism and consequent increase 
of morbid products. 

Second — Liberation into the blood of such 
products which had been previously stored up 
in some part or viscus. 

Third — Diminution of the eliminative power 
of some organ or organs by which these products 
had been previously separated from the blood. 

It is probably under one of these heads that is 
to be classed a general perturbation of the system. 



46 CHAPTER IV. 

The neuropathy has the following qualities in 
common with neuritis, that of ascending or 
descending from its primary seat, unless that be 
in the ultimate fibrils when it necessarily has 
an ascending power only. In common with 
neuritis and neuralgia, that of affecting the state 
of the spinal {and possibly of higher,) centres 
and radiation thence to other nerve territories. 

The highest and lower cerebral centres must 

be credited with the power of originating or 

aggravating the general gouty condition. 

Conceivably through their known potentiality 

over recognised seats of metabolic activity. 

r perhaps also be credited with the 

determining local outbreaks. Con- 

hrough tbeir known potentiality over 

especially vaso-motor nerves. The 

ect being due to the altered conduct- 

le affected peripheral nerve. 

Ii cerebral centres are also liable to be 

' the blood dyscrasia (e.g., ill temper, 

a), but in what way this is brought 

e is no evidence to show. 



CHAPTER TV. 47 

There is no doubt that a biurate salt may be 
deposited in some of the viscera aflPected by 
localised gout. Such a deposition is usual when 
the part aflFected is a joint. This is by no means 
a necessary or invariable result, according to the 
only evidence at our disposal. For while on the 
one hand the deposit has been found many 
years after a joint had been affected once only, 
on the other none has been discoverable in a 
joint which had been many times affected. 
This deposit must be looked upon as an 
epiphenomenon. And its presence is probably 
due to the peculiar mode in which joints are 
nourished. The amount of deposit is, speaking 
generally, in inverse proportion to the acuteness 
of the other symptoms, and therefore less in the 
earlier attacks and greater in the later ones. 
It may also take place in the absence of any 
preceding or concomitant pain, or redness, or of 
any swelling except that which itself produces. 
An attack in a joint is sometimes followed by a 
cessation of extraneous symptoms which we 
suppose to depend upon the abnormal state of 



48 CHAPTER IV. 

the blood. When this is so it would appear that 
it is either evidence, or the cause, of a reversion 
to normal metabolism, but in what way this 
result is produced we have no evidence. 



49 



CHAPTEK V. 



A THEORY however specious is valueless 
-^^^ except in as far as it is based on facts, 
which it not only recognises but harmonises. 
It may I think be fairly claimed for this theory 
that it harmonises and brings into line a greater 
number of the admitted facts of Gout than any 
other. It does not fail to recognise that there 
are important elements of the disease the 
nature of which is as yet concealed from our 
eyes. But it is not in hostility to any 
admitted facts. 

It recognises two great classes of facts. 
First — Those which have for ages been seen 
to indicate that the fluids of the body are 
concerned in the production of gout and which 
are therefore the basis of the humoral theory. 



50 OHAPTEB V. 

Second — Those which indicate that the 
nervous system is concerned in the production 
of gout, and are the basis of the neural or nerve 
theory of gout. 

This latter since the time of Cullen has 

always held a distinct though fluctuating hold 

of medical opinion. Of late years these two at 

one time opposing theories have been more or 

less held in conjunction. As indeed it seems to 

me they must be, unless we ignore some of the 

most prominent features, and best ascertained 

facts of the disorder. The weakness of the 

nerve theory haa hitherto been its vagueness. 

And this has materially retarded its general 

acceptance. To this hitherto almost abstract 

proposition the localisation of the nerve element 

in a definite section of the nervous system gives 

concreteness. To many minds " the nervous 

relation, means nothing. 

ich they can grasp. There 

such difficulty in regard to 

at least provisionally term 

ne a tangible basis is given 



CHAPTER V. 51 

to the nerve theory and thus should commend 
my theory to the holders of that view. Nor 
have I excluded the possible co-operation of the 
spinal centres. On the contrary it has been 
pointed out in what way they may be affected. 
And this way is in accord with the teachings of 
general pathology. Similarly it has been pointed 
out in what way the highest centres may have 
an influence, though it remains for the future to 
show in what way or ways their influence is 
actually exercised and the results of such 
exercise. It is to be borne in mind that if no 
more precise explanation is offered here neither 
is one offered elsewhere. 

So much for general considerations in favour 
of the theory which I have presented. Let us 
now look at some particular ones. 

How does this suggested theory fit in with 
known clinical facts ? Foremost of these is the 
immense preponderance of attacks of acute gout 
in the tarso-metatarsal joint of the great toe as 
compared with any other joint. Any theory of 
gout which does not explain this fact is 



52 CHAPTER V. 

inadequate, even if it is not so far as it goes 
erroneous. How is this explained at present. 
Firstly — by the remoteness of the part from the 
centre of circulation. Secondly — by pointing 
out that the whole weight of the body rests in 
walking upon this joint. As regards the circu- 
lation it is no more remote than that of tlie 
corresponding joints of the other toes As 
regards the weight of the body. In the first 
place, the weight of the foot, which is insig- 
nificant in proportion to the total body weight 
is the only burden which the toe bears in excess 
of that which is borne by the ankle. 

But the whole weight of the body does not 
rest upon the great toe. It is divided between 
that and the other toes, the combined area of 
whose tarso-metatarsal joints cannot be much 
less, even if it is not more than that of the 
great toe-joint. But between this and the other 
toes there is this difference. The nerves around 
the great toe joint are not deeply seated in 
the soft parts, they are subject to pressure on 
the sole aspect by the weight of the body, on 



CHAPTER V. 53 

the inner and upper aspects by the upper leather 
of the shoes. Whereas the nerves of the other 
toes which are rarely attacked are protected by 
the soft parts and by the cushion of the sole 
and are in most boots much less pressed upon 
than the great toe by the upper leather. I 
submit then that a local nerve theory of gout 
affords a satisfactory explanation of this clinical 
fact, which current views do not. 

It is known that repeated attacks may 
occupy a great toe-joint which on subsequent 
examination does not show any uratic infiltra- 
tion. It seems to me probable that in an 
ordinary attack there are two elements. An 
inflammation of the joint, and an inflammation 
of the neighbouring soft parts. On the nerve 
theory and having regard to the nerve distribu- 
tion we can understand this and we can suspect 
that one element may occur without the other. 
It is indeed a matter of inference, rather than 
of observation, in many cases, that the joint has 
been affected at all. On the other hand we 
know that in old cases where the joint 



54 CHAPTBE T. 

destruction and infiltration proceed most actively 
the inflammation of the soft parts is commonly 
at a minimum. The same is true of the other 
joints. We see also uratic deposits formed in 
parts which have never, so far as we can judge, 
been the seat of any inflammatory process. Or 
if of any, it has been of the slightest and most 
transient character. 

It is known that tophi are very common in 

the ear. This may be due partly to cold but 

more I think to pressure. They are usually 

accompanied or preceded by very slight in- 

f symptoms, often by none. The 

8 made by the weight of the head 
ig them against tbe pillow in bed. 
especially when the ear is doubled up 
happens. We then get mechanical 
,he outside, and strain on the inside 
the auricle. In other words pressure 

9 pressure and stretching on the other. 
at infrequency of gout in the hip-joint 
ommented on by writers. I suggest 
s due to the great protection from cold 



CHAPTER V. 55 

and external injury afforded to its nerves by 
the depth at which they Ue in a mass of soft 
parts. The sciatic nerve itself from which one 
at least of these nerves springs at a high level, 
is on the contrary much exposed to both cold 
and pressure and is a common seat of gouty 
affection. The shooting pains, the localised 
tendernesses are equally explicable. So also the 
cramps, often a most troublesome symptom. 

It is well-known that the most acute attacks 
of toe-gout may be made to disappear with 
great rapidity. One method which has been 
adopted — amongst others by the great Harvey 
in his own case — ^is to plunge the foot into cold 
water. Another is by giving freely of colchicum. 
There are others, but these two will suffice. 
Now if the inflammation of the great toe be 
caused by a deposition of a uric salt in the 
cartilage, a condition which is known to be 
extremely stable, we have great difficulty in 
seeing how its removal may be effected in so 
short a time. On the other hand we know that 
the phenomena of neuritis and still more of 



56 CHAPTER V. 

neuralgia are exceedingly inconstant, that they 
may appear and disappear spontaneously with 
great suddenness. We thus have an explan- 
ation, which at least is not incomprehensible, of 
the effect of such agents as cold and colchicum 
upon acute gout. To those who hold that 
colchicum is a drug which acts, not as an 
eliminant, but directly upon some part of the 
nervous system, this explanation appeals with 
superior force. It affords indeed a strong 
argument in support of their view. It is also 
worthy of notice that Weir-Mitchell insists 
strongly on the free application of ice in con- 
gestion of nerves. 

Let us now briefly consider the bearing of 

this view upon the various gouty affections of 

internal organs. In the first place it cannot be 

denied that, while the existence of such disorders 

is fully recognised by many of us, it is very 

' * ^ ' admitted by a considerable school 

nion is not to be treated with, nor 

jition removed by, contempt. 

seems to me that this opposition has 

irisen from a conception of gout. 



CHAPTER V. 57 

postulating for its existence the tissues of a 
joint. It is from this conception that have 
arisen the terms of regular and irregular gout. 
There is not much analogy between the special 
tissues of a joint and those of a mucous 
membrane. Into a mind dominated by the idea 
that without a joint localised gout is not possible 
it is easy to see that the idea of gout in a 
mucous membrane will enter with diflficulty. 
But with the admission of the idea that the 
starting point of a localisation of gout is an 
affection of the local nerves, this dijB&culty is 
removed. It enables us also to answer definitely 
questions which I have often had put to me by 
a colleague in a consultation in some such 
form as this. "Here is a case of bronchial 
catarrh, with all the ordinary physical signs and 
symptoms. What do you mean by saying it is 
' gouty ' ? Do you think that all bronchial or 
other catarrhs are gouty ? " These or suchlike 
questions put in good faith require an answer, 
which I have hitherto given as follows. " I do 
not consider all bronchial or other catarrhs to 



58 GHAPTER V. 

be gouty; not necessarily so even when one 
occurs in a person who has had gout. By gouty 
catarrh I mean a catarrh which has for one of 
its factors the gouty poison in the blood. The 
reason I think this particular case is in this 
category is, firstly, because your treatment, very 
proper for a case of simple bronchitis, has failed. 
It has failed because it has not removed the 
gouty factor. Secondly, because there are now 
present, or quite recently have been, symptoms 
which are common in gout, from which I infer 
that this patient is in a gouty condition. 
Thirdly, I have known many cases of catarrh 
which have not been relieved till the treatment 
has been based upon this view." I should now 
make this explanation more definite, and there- 
fore more acceptable by saying that the 
persistence of the disorder was due to the 
deterioration of the local nerves by the agency 
of the gouty poison. 

This explanation is applicable to any one of 
the multifarious manifestations of gout. At all 
events in any part the nerves of which are 



r 



CHAPTEB V. 59 

covered by a neurilemma. Whether or no gout 
poison can act directly upon naked nerves is a 
matter for future examination. 

It is much to be hoped that the evidence of 
local nerve disorder in localised gout which I 
have collected may lead to an investigation of 
the state of these nerves by some of our younger 
pathologists, who have the necessary accomplish- 
ments and time at their disposal. Is this 
disorder due to neuritis, to congestion, to 
primary degeneration or to the changes, what- 
ever they may be, which produce the state 
known to us as neuralgia. Clinical features may 
be recognised which might be explained by any 
one of these, and are especially in accord with 
congestion, neuralgia and neuritis. 

The theory I have advocated forms a definite 
basis for the neural element of neuro-humoral 
theory of gout and brings into one line a 
greater number of the clinical features of gout 
than any other one. I commend both it and 
the facts on which it is based to the candid 
consideration of the profession. 



Printed by Osborne & Son, 84, New Street, Birmingham.